the time trend in ten years
district-wise, year-wise cases
how does the district-wise comparison look?
the crime rate
share of each district
share in population and in crime of rape, a graphical presentation
how do major urban areas fare considering the urban and rural male and female literacy?
Two maps to compare district -wise rates of total crimes and rapes
The crime of rape can be considered the most heinous crime against a woman barring perhaps only her murder. The character of any society is decided by the dignity of the women in the society and the security that women get against the crime of rape. A continuous watch on the situation of rape crimes is therefore of immense importance.
According to the crime statistics published by National Crime Records Bureau, more than 15,000 women get raped in one year. The investigation, presentation before the courts and the actual justice delivery are processes that are enormously delayed. According to the Crime Report of 1998, as many as 5793 cases were pending with the police for investigation on 1.1.1999. Those pending in the courts on that date were 48685. It is further noteworthy that out of nearly 10000 rape cases decided by the courts in 1998 only 2577 were convicted. This means that compared with pending cases the conviction rate is as low as 5 percent. The lower punishment even in convicted cases is a matter of further worry.
1. Some vital statistics for the total crime profile of the country :
· Total population in 1996 (mid-decade projection) = 99.09 crores
2. On analyzing the available data about rapes committed in Maharashtra during the last 10 years, one comes up with some important findings which need to be considered by all those who are actively working for reducing crime against women, especially rape.
Chart 1 here shows the districtwise and revenue divisionwise details of rapes registered with the police during 1990 to 1999. Chart 2 shows a line-graph of total rapes committed from year to year.
From these, following points can be noted
Out of the 30 districts, then existing, only the districts of Ratnagiri, Kolhapur, Sangli, Nanded and Osmanabad have not shown an increase during 1996. These are also the districts registering a small number and a smaller rate of rapes. It should be a matter of more detailed study by the police, the sociologists and the NGOs as to why the 1996 figures of rape are so high. What new situations or trends came up then which resulted in such a sharp increase in the number of rapes?
The trend of sudden jump has started in 1995 itself. The districts of Mumbai, Thane, Nasik, Amravati registered very high increase compared to rape crimes committed during 1994.
The total number of rapes committed during the year 2000 is nearly 1400 which means that the number has once again reached the level of 1996. Alternatively, one may ask how the rapes registered during 96-97-98 show a gradual decline. See chart 2.
chart 1
|
district |
pop96 |
rape90 |
rape91 |
rape92 |
rape93 |
rape94 |
rape95 |
rape96 |
rape97 |
rape98 |
rape99 |
total |
Ave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUMBAI |
15000 |
107 |
114 |
104 |
131 |
160 |
234 |
171 |
150 |
136 |
162 |
1469 |
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SINDHUDURG |
859 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
13 |
9 |
12 |
9 |
7 |
9 |
81 |
8 |
|
RATNAGIRI |
1633 |
8 |
9 |
18 |
17 |
17 |
14 |
11 |
13 |
18 |
26 |
151 |
15 |
|
RAIGAD |
2020 |
16 |
7 |
10 |
11 |
15 |
14 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
20 |
139 |
14 |
|
THANE |
6979 |
63 |
81 |
79 |
99 |
83 |
101 |
107 |
105 |
97 |
102 |
917 |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KOLHAPUR |
3295 |
25 |
29 |
22 |
14 |
25 |
24 |
16 |
22 |
32 |
34 |
243 |
24 |
|
SANGLI |
2422 |
33 |
23 |
27 |
19 |
24 |
25 |
18 |
23 |
23 |
22 |
237 |
24 |
|
SOLAPUR |
3595 |
21 |
21 |
29 |
33 |
29 |
34 |
43 |
30 |
41 |
36 |
317 |
32 |
|
SATARA |
2685 |
26 |
23 |
17 |
28 |
25 |
22 |
27 |
23 |
23 |
27 |
241 |
24 |
|
PUNE |
6389 |
48 |
63 |
82 |
83 |
85 |
92 |
86 |
72 |
91 |
103 |
805 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASHIK |
4384 |
26 |
29 |
23 |
30 |
36 |
44 |
52 |
35 |
40 |
32 |
347 |
35 |
|
DHULE |
2818 |
18 |
19 |
22 |
26 |
42 |
25 |
29 |
41 |
18 |
30 |
270 |
27 |
|
JALGAON |
3515 |
22 |
15 |
12 |
20 |
48 |
27 |
40 |
44 |
22 |
38 |
288 |
29 |
|
AHMEDNAGAR |
3757 |
22 |
28 |
32 |
35 |
43 |
31 |
44 |
33 |
31 |
24 |
323 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AURANGABAD |
2161 |
12 |
26 |
25 |
23 |
27 |
28 |
42 |
26 |
25 |
28 |
262 |
26 |
|
JALNA |
1567 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
14 |
111 |
11 |
|
PARBHANI |
2400 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
18 |
17 |
29 |
24 |
27 |
22 |
30 |
204 |
20 |
|
NANDED |
2684 |
11 |
18 |
16 |
28 |
22 |
27 |
19 |
31 |
12 |
30 |
214 |
21 |
|
BEED |
2065 |
8 |
11 |
21 |
14 |
23 |
13 |
23 |
27 |
15 |
30 |
185 |
19 |
|
LATUR |
1907 |
5 |
7 |
14 |
5 |
13 |
10 |
22 |
18 |
15 |
6 |
115 |
12 |
|
OSMANABAD |
1419 |
11 |
3 |
17 |
14 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
23 |
141 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BULDHANA |
2106 |
26 |
11 |
15 |
35 |
36 |
23 |
37 |
28 |
20 |
27 |
258 |
26 |
|
AKOLA |
2435 |
23 |
17 |
25 |
33 |
33 |
31 |
43 |
24 |
29 |
30 |
288 |
29 |
|
AMRAVATI |
2390 |
68 |
51 |
58 |
74 |
89 |
109 |
100 |
87 |
73 |
106 |
815 |
82 |
|
YAVATMAL |
2270 |
26 |
37 |
43 |
52 |
72 |
54 |
69 |
45 |
57 |
70 |
525 |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHANDARA |
2256 |
46 |
42 |
60 |
56 |
78 |
63 |
81 |
72 |
50 |
63 |
611 |
61 |
|
NAGPUR |
3718 |
72 |
89 |
97 |
103 |
107 |
134 |
112 |
92 |
92 |
89 |
987 |
99 |
|
WARDHA |
1144 |
35 |
30 |
32 |
36 |
37 |
30 |
46 |
30 |
53 |
38 |
367 |
37 |
|
CHANDRAPUR |
1980 |
47 |
47 |
46 |
62 |
45 |
45 |
69 |
48 |
45 |
44 |
498 |
50 |
|
GADCHIROLI |
874 |
24 |
27 |
17 |
23 |
22 |
41 |
45 |
33 |
12 |
18 |
262 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL MAHA |
92727 |
869 |
898 |
988 |
1137 |
1297 |
1355 |
1434 |
1237 |
1149 |
1311 |
11675 |
1168 |
chart 2

Chart 3 below is a graphical depiction of the rate of rapes committed in 1996, the 10-year average and the rate of rapes committed in 1999.
chart 3

The above analysis speaks of rape cases in terms of absolute numbers. It can facilitate the government to decide upon the quantum of deployment of suitable investigative machinery, police personnel, computerization, better forensic facility, higher budget, closer monitoring, etc. in problem districts. A sociologist, however, is concerned more with the rate of crimes. Different districts have smaller or bigger geographical area and higher or lower population. Hence for a comparison, rate of crime provides a different variety of indicators. A district having lower population but higher number of rapes, is definitely a bigger problem to the sociologists and they need to investigate the reasons for higher criminal mentality.
3. Crime rate
Chart 4 here shows the rate of rapes per crore population during the 1995 to 1999.
Chart 4
|
district |
95% |
96% |
97% |
98% |
99% |
av rate 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUMBAI |
156 |
114 |
100 |
91 |
108 |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SINDHUDURG |
105 |
140 |
105 |
81 |
105 |
93 |
|
|
RATNAGIRI |
86 |
67 |
80 |
110 |
159 |
92 |
|
|
RAIGAD |
69 |
74 |
74 |
79 |
99 |
69 |
|
|
THANE |
145 |
153 |
150 |
139 |
146 |
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KOLHAPUR |
73 |
49 |
67 |
97 |
103 |
73 |
|
|
SANGLI |
103 |
74 |
95 |
95 |
91 |
99 |
|
|
SOLAPUR |
95 |
120 |
83 |
114 |
100 |
89 |
|
|
SATARA |
82 |
101 |
86 |
86 |
101 |
89 |
|
|
PUNE |
144 |
135 |
113 |
142 |
161 |
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASHIK |
100 |
119 |
80 |
91 |
73 |
80 |
|
|
DHULE |
89 |
103 |
146 |
64 |
106 |
96 |
|
|
JALGAON |
77 |
114 |
125 |
63 |
108 |
83 |
|
|
AHMEDNAGAR |
83 |
117 |
88 |
83 |
64 |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AURANGABAD |
130 |
194 |
120 |
116 |
130 |
120 |
|
|
JALNA |
38 |
134 |
140 |
140 |
89 |
70 |
|
|
PARBHANI |
121 |
100 |
113 |
92 |
125 |
83 |
|
|
NANDED |
101 |
71 |
115 |
45 |
112 |
78 |
|
|
BEED |
63 |
111 |
131 |
73 |
145 |
92 |
|
|
LATUR |
52 |
115 |
94 |
79 |
31 |
63 |
|
|
OSMANABAD |
113 |
70 |
85 |
85 |
162 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BULDHANA
|
|
| -size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black'>109
|
176 |
133 |
95 |
128 |
123 |
||
|
AKOLA |
127 |
177 |
99 |
119 |
123 |
119 |
|
|
AMRAVATI tot |
456 |
418 |
364 |
305 |
444 |
343 |
|
|
YAVATMAL |
238 |
304 |
198 |
251 |
308 |
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHANDARA |
279 |
359 |
319 |
222 |
279 |
270 |
|
|
NAGPUR |
360 |
301 |
247 |
247 |
239 |
266 |
|
|
WARDHA |
262 |
402 |
262 |
463 |
332 |
323 |
|
|
CHANDRAPUR |
227 |
349 |
242 |
227 |
222 |
253 |
|
|
GADCHIROLI |
469 |
515 |
378 |
137 |
206 |
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all maha |
146 |
155 |
133 |
124 |
141 |
126 |
From these it is seen,
More rapes than their population share?
Chart 5 below shows the ranking of all districts in order of the rate of rapes per crore, in 1996. It also gives the share of the district in the total number of rapes in last 10 years as well as share in population. The share in rapes rates over 10 years has been graphically represented in Chart 6, whereas share in rape rates is at the end of the article.
Chart 5
|
<district sort |
popu |
% Rp 96 |
10 yr av |
Rp share |
pop share |
diff. |
|
GADCHIROLI |
874 |
515 |
26 |
2.2 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
|
AMRAVATI |
2390 |
418 |
82 |
7.0 |
2.6 |
4.4 |
|
WARDHA |
1144 |
402 |
37 |
3.2 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
|
BHANDARA |
2256 |
359 |
61 |
5.2 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
|
CHANDRAPUR |
1980 |
349 |
50 |
4.3 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
|
YAVATMAL |
2270 |
304 |
53 |
4.5 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
|
NAGPUR. |
3718 |
301 |
99 |
8.5 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
|
AURANGABAD |
2161 |
194 |
26 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
-0.1 |
|
AKOLA |
2435 |
177 |
29 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
-0.1 |
|
BULDHANA |
2106 |
176 |
26 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
0.0 |
|
THANE |
6979 |
153 |
92 |
7.9 |
7.5 |
0.4 |
|
SINDHUDURG |
859 |
140 |
8 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
-0.2 |
|
PUNE |
6389 |
135 |
81 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
0.0 |
|
JALNA |
1567 |
134 |
11 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
-0.7 |
|
SOLAPUR |
3595 |
120 |
32 |
2.7 |
3.9 |
-1.1 |
|
NASIK |
4384 |
119 |
35 |
3.0 |
4.7 |
-1.7 |
|
AHMEDNAGAR |
3757 |
117 |
32 |
2.7 |
4.1 |
-1.3 |
|
LATUR |
1907 |
115 |
12 |
1.0 |
2.1 |
-1.0 |
|
JALGAON |
3515 |
114 |
29 |
2.5 |
3.8 |
-1.3 |
|
BEED |
2065 |
111 |
19 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
-0.6 |
|
DHULE |
2818 |
103 |
27 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
-0.7 |
|
MUMBAI |
15000 |
102 |
147 |
12.6 |
16.2 |
-3.6 |
|
SATARA |
2685 |
101 |
24 |
2.1 |
2.9 |
-0.8 |
|
PARBHANI |
2400 |
100 |
20 |
1.7 |
2.6 |
-0.9 |
|
SANGLI |
2422 |
74 |
24 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
-0.6 |
|
RAIGAD |
2020 |
74 |
14 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
-1.0 |
|
NANDED |
2684 |
71 |
21 |
1.8 |
2.9 |
-1.1 |
|
OSMANABAD |
1419 |
70 |
14 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
-0.3 |
|
RATNAGIRI |
1633 |
67 |
15 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
-0.5 |
|
KOLHAPUR |
3295 |
49 |
24 |
2.1 |
3.6 |
-1.5 |
|
all maha |
92727 |
154.6 |
1168 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
chart 6

4. Urban Scenario
· A comparison is also made between the rapes committed in rural and urban areas. Chart 7 give a comparison of rapes committed in major cities of Maharashtra, namely, Mumbai, Thane, Pune, Solapur, Nasik, Aurangabad and Amravati.
chart 7
|
DTNAME |
POPULN 91 |
Un M Lit% |
U F Lit%> |
R M Lit% |
R F Lit% |
urb |
rur |
total |
% of u/t Rp |
% of u/t pop |
|
MUMBAI |
9925891 |
77 |
65 |
|
|
147 |
|
147 |
|
|
|
THANE |
5249126 |
72 |
61 |
51 |
31 |
45 |
47 |
92 |
49 |
65 |
|
RAIGARH |
1824816 |
74 |
60 |
60 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATNAGIRI |
1544057 |
78 |
67 |
62 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SINDHUDURG |
832152 |
82 |
73 |
73 |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASHIK |
3851352 |
71 |
57 |
54 |
31 |
9 |
26 |
35 |
26 |
36 |
|
DHULE |
2535715 |
71 |
55 |
47 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JALGAON |
3187634 |
72 |
55 |
61 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A'NAGAR |
3372935 |
73 |
56 |
59 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PUNE |
5532532 |
75 |
62 |
62 |
38 |
48 |
32 |
80 |
60 |
51 |
|
SATARA |
2451372 |
76 |
62 |
65 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SANGLI |
2209488 |
70 |
55 |
61 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLAPUR |
3231057 |
68 |
47 |
53 |
29 |
13 |
19 |
32 |
41 |
29 |
|
KOLHAPUR |
2989507 |
75 |
60 |
65 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AURANGABAD |
2213779 |
70 |
51 |
52 |
22 |
12 |
14 |
26 |
46 |
33 |
|
JALNA |
1364425 |
63 |
43 |
48 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARBHANI |
2117035 |
63 |
42 |
48 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BID |
1822072 |
67 |
46 |
49 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NANDED |
2330374 |
65 |
44 |
47 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSMANABAD |
1276327 |
68 |
47 |
53 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LATUR |
1676641 |
67 |
46 |
54 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BULDANA |
1886299 |
70 |
53 |
60 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AKOLA |
2214271 |
70 |
57 |
61 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMRAVATI |
2200057 |
73 |
62 |
62 |
46 |
13 |
59 |
72 |
18 |
33 |
|
YAVATMAL |
2077144 |
73 |
58 |
55 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WARDHA |
1067357 |
76 |
65 |
63 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAGPUR |
3287139 |
74 |
62 |
60 |
42 |
48 |
51 |
99 |
48 |
62 |
|
BHANDARA |
2107629 |
78 |
61 |
64 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANDRAPUR |
1771994 |
71 |
55 |
55 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GADCHIROLI |
787010 |
69 |
49 |
44 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL MAHA |
78937187 |
73 |
60 |
57 |
34 |
335 |
|
|
|
|
The total rapes committed in these cities during the last 10 years are 29% of total rapes in Maharashtra while the total population of these cities was 32% of the total population of Maharashtra in 1996.
A comparison between the crimes committed in the whole of the district and those committed in the city alone show that Pune city contributed for 60% of the total crimes in Pune district, while Nagpur city contributed 48% of rapes in Nagpur district. This proportion was 49% in Thane city (vis-a-vis Thane district), 46% in Aurangabad city, 41% in Solapur city, 26% in Nasik and 18% in Amravati city. A comparison of these figures with the female literacy rate shows that all the cities have a fairly high female liveracy rate. Surely, therefore, the reasons for high rate of rapes cannot be attributed to lack of education.
The reason is perhaps to be searched in terms of industrialization, agro based economy, tribal population, low economic growth, a larger divide between high and low income groups and so on.
· Another important feature is a comparison of per centages of urban to total rapes Vs urban to total population of these districts. Pune, Solapur, and Aurangabad have more rapes in urban areas than the population there whereas Thane, Nagpur, Nashik and Amravati have more rapes in rural areas. The rural parts of all these 4 districts have a larger tribal population. This is also a pointer. Once again, more detailed studies as to who were victims and who were accused is needed.
· Which districts have lowest rural female literacy rates? They are the districts of Marathwada Division, namely Aurangabad, Jalna, Parbhani, Nanded, Beed, Latur and Osmanabad; all having less than 30% rural female literacy. Except Gadchiroli, no other district has such low rates of rural female literacy and yet, by and large these are districts of low rape rate except the highly industrial city of Aurangabad.
5. See chart 5 (colunms to be inserted): On comparing the incidence of rapes with the incidence of total crimes in a district, it is seen that -
chart 8

Chart 8 above shows the difference in rates of rape and total crime. Districts of high crime- high rapes and those of low crime- low rapes will both fall near the zero line. Yet another insight can be had from Chart 9 and Chart 10 which give graded maps of Maharashtra showing the rate of rapes vis-a-vis rate of total crimes committed in 1996 in all districts.
6. So we can see what kind of analysis and implementation strategy is possible. The existing crime records give us some district specific clues and recommendations. For example, it suggests that -
(i) The Home Deptt. of Maharashtra may immediately take a review of their police strength and efficiency of investigation including preventing measures in the Nagpur and Amravati divisions so as to control the higher rate of rapes in these Divisions.
(ii) Ratnagiri has shown a sharp increase in 1998. The reasons for such increase in an otherwise peace-loving and women- respecting district like Ratnagiri need to be searched. This can be taken up by the Supdt. of Police of Ratnagiri.
(iii) Special efforts are needed to reduce the higher rate of crime in Amravati (Rural) and Nagpur (both urban and rural).
(iv) Special study sould be undertaken to find out the socio-economic profile of the victims and the accused in the tribal blocks of Amravati and Nagpur divisions, as well as in tribal blocks of Nashik and Thane districts.
It will be worthwhile to compare this data with the situation in Dhule which is also predominantly tribal district but with low rate of rapes. It is pertinent to note that the tribals of Dhule district have slightly better land-holdings than the tribals of other districts of Maharashtra.
7. In all the above analysis two factors are not being considered. In many cases of rapes the societical conditions and the fear of stigma on the victim girl prevent her and her family from making a complaint to the police. In many cases they are also afraid of the humiliating manner and questions that are asked by police and therefore refrain from making a complaint. In many more cases the police closes the complaint without registering FIR and without making further investigation butby stating that there was not enough evidence to proceed with the cases. More cases of first two types will come to light by a better awareness and sensitization programmes and support systems which can be provided by the NGOs. For taking case of the third type of cases, which are commonly called “NC” cases, it should be made compulsory for the police to register FIR for each and every case of complaint of rape made to them and bring up it before the court whatever be the preliminary findings. It should also be compulsory to report of this data on a monthly basis to NCRB who should then publish the same in their annual reports. A comparison of the number of crimes recorded and the number of “cases closed without investigation” can be a key indicator about the working of the police in the district.
8. Surprisingly the district of Ahmadnagar as compared to other districts was comparatively a low crime district (as far as rape was concerned) except during 1996. This image of Ahmadnagar will now remain shattered forever in the wake of recent incidence of collective and multiple rapes committed by young dacoits on the women of village Kothewadi. This was a case of a gang rape as well as mass rape which was so far unheard of in Maharashtra and can be considered as the most obnoxious crime. It has so far, also eluded all explanations of traditional types. The gory details of the incidence are indicative of the new methods and psyche being brought into crime scenario by the media depictions of women.
9. Some new aspects and some theoretical questions go beyond the analysis of the data -
(I) There is a sharp increase in organized rape and sexual exploitation of women. The incidence like mass rapes in Kothewadi is likely to repeat. It will require a very different and concerted approach to prevent any such incidence in future. It is quite obvious that such thinking and efforts have not yet started.
(II) In recent past, we have also faced the sex scandals in Jalgaon (in 1994) and Satara (2001) in which women were given temptation of jobs, were lured into sexual act and their photographs were taken in compromising situations and they were subjected to further repeated blackmails, rape and other forms of sexual exploitation. Such a criminal activity went on for a long period of one to two years involving several girls who were victimized and several males who had organized such victimization. These cases came to light only after long periods had elapsed and therefore became difficult to prove even though their gravity was much higher.
(III) Perhaps the worst was not over. In Parbhani district, we heard the case of one girl student being called by her several teachers to give her the “most expected questions” for the next day’s. She was gangraped by her own teachers. This incidence strikes at the very root of Indian culture where it is believed that true knowledge comes only through a very pure relationship and understanding between the teacher and the student.
10. Although the cases of gang rapes, mass rapes and scandals like the above have started occuring with alarming frequency, the police has not yet started maintaining separate or specialised investigations. This must be started immediately so that the problem is monitored properly and its solution is tried early.
11. It must be mentioned that this article is meant to analyse only the profile of crimes against women which are brought up to the police. It does not discuss the questions of -
(i) Poor rate of conviction.
(ii) Enormous delay in justice delivery.
(iii) Attitude and ethical/legal responsibility of the defence lawyers.
(iv) Efficiency or otherwise of the prosecution machinery.
(v) Inadequate monitoring by the apex courts.
(vi) Inadequate and at times faulty examination by the forensic agencies.
(vii) Faulty investigation and improper handling or mishandling of the evidence material by the police.
Each of these aspects are important in reducing the rate of crime and ensuring proper justice. Each, therefore, merits a separate detailed study and analysis.
[The author is Joint Secretary to Govt. of India in National Commission for Women. This is part of her study of Maharashtra Profiles of Crimes Against Women. ]



