This web page is created by Leena Mehendale

the time trend in ten years
district-wise, year-wise cases
how does the district-wise comparison look?
the crime rate
share of each district
share in population and in crime of rape, a graphical presentation
how do major urban areas fare considering the urban and rural male and female literacy?
Two maps to compare district -wise rates of total crimes and rapes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

Maharashtra Profile on Crime Against Women: Rape

---- Leena Mehendale, IAS

The crime of rape can be considered the most heinous crime against a woman barring perhaps only her murder. The character of any society is decided by the dignity of the women in the society and the security that women get against the crime of rape. A continuous watch on the situation of rape crimes is therefore of immense importance.

According to the crime statistics published by National Crime Records Bureau, more than 15,000 women get raped in one year. The investigation, presentation before the courts and the actual justice delivery are processes that are enormously delayed. According to the Crime Report of 1998, as many as 5793 cases were pending with the police for investigation on 1.1.1999. Those pending in the courts on that date were 48685. It is further noteworthy that out of nearly 10000 rape cases decided by the courts in 1998 only 2577 were convicted. This means that compared with pending cases the conviction rate is as low as 5 percent. The lower punishment even in convicted cases is a matter of further worry.

 

1. Some vital statistics for the total crime profile of the country :

·        Total population in 1996 (mid-decade projection) = 99.09 crores
·        Total crimes registered under IPC in 1998 = 17.80 lacs
·        Rate of crime = 183 crimes per lac of population
·        For Maharashtra the rate of crime was 202 crimes per lac of population. This is higher than the all India average.
·        Total rape cases registered in the entire country in 1998 = 15,031
·        Rate of crime = 155 rape cases per one crore of population
·        The rate of rape cases for Maharashtra in 1998 was 124 per one crore of the population which is lower than the all India average.
·        Considering that only women are victims of rape, the rate of crime actually stands at double the above values.

 

2. On analyzing the available data about rapes committed in Maharashtra during the last 10 years, one comes up with some important findings which need to be considered by all those who are actively working for reducing crime against women, especially rape.

 

Chart 1 here shows the districtwise and revenue divisionwise details of rapes registered with the police during 1990 to 1999. Chart 2 shows a line-graph of total rapes committed from year to year.

From these, following points can be noted

       One disturbing fact that comes to the notice is that there is a sudden increase in the number of rape cases in majority of the districts during the year 1996.

 

Out of the 30 districts, then existing, only the districts of Ratnagiri, Kolhapur, Sangli, Nanded and Osmanabad have not shown an increase during 1996. These are also the districts registering a small number and a smaller rate of rapes. It should be a matter of more detailed study by the police, the sociologists and the NGOs as to why the 1996 figures of rape are so high. What new situations or trends came up then which resulted in such a sharp increase in the number of rapes?

 

The trend of sudden jump has started in 1995 itself. The districts of Mumbai, Thane, Nasik, Amravati registered very high increase compared to rape crimes committed during 1994.

The total number of rapes committed during the year 2000 is nearly 1400 which means that the number has once again reached the level of 1996. Alternatively, one may ask how the rapes registered during 96-97-98 show a gradual decline. See chart 2.

 

chart 1

district

pop96

rape90

rape91

rape92

rape93

rape94

rape95

rape96

rape97

rape98

rape99

total

Ave

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MUMBAI

15000

107

114

104

131

160

234

171

150

136

162

1469

147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SINDHUDURG

859

5

3

7

7

13

9

12

9

7

9

81

8

RATNAGIRI

1633

8

9

18

17

17

14

11

13

18

26

151

15

RAIGAD

2020

16

7

10

11

15

14

15

15

16

20

139

14

THANE

6979

63

81

79

99

83

101

107

105

97

102

917

92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KOLHAPUR

3295

25

29

22

14

25

24

16

22

32

34

243

24

SANGLI

2422

33

23

27

19

24

25

18

23

23

22

237

24

SOLAPUR

3595

21

21

29

33

29

34

43

30

41

36

317

32

SATARA

2685

26

23

17

28

25

22

27

23

23

27

241

24

PUNE

6389

48

63

82

83

85

92

86

72

91

103

805

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NASHIK

4384

26

29

23

30

36

44

52

35

40

32

347

35

DHULE

2818

18

19

22

26

42

25

29

41

18

30

270

27

JALGAON

3515

22

15

12

20

48

27

40

44

22

38

288

29

AHMEDNAGAR

3757

22

28

32

35

43

31

44

33

31

24

323

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AURANGABAD

2161

12

26

25

23

27

28

42

26

25

28

262

26

JALNA

1567

4

0

6

8

8

6

21

22

22

14

111

11

PARBHANI

2400

11

14

12

18

17

29

24

27

22

30

204

20

NANDED

2684

11

18

16

28

22

27

19

31

12

30

214

21

BEED

2065

8

11

21

14

23

13

23

27

15

30

185

19

LATUR

1907

5

7

14

5

13

10

22

18

15

6

115

12

OSMANABAD

1419

11

3

17

14

23

16

10

12

12

23

141

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BULDHANA

2106

26

11

15

35

36

23

37

28

20

27

258

26

AKOLA

2435

23

17

25

33

33

31

43

24

29

30

288

29

AMRAVATI

2390

68

51

58

74

89

109

100

87

73

106

815

82

YAVATMAL

2270

26

37

43

52

72

54

69

45

57

70

525

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BHANDARA

2256

46

42

60

56

78

63

81

72

50

63

611

61

NAGPUR

3718

72

89

97

103

107

134

112

92

92

89

987

99

WARDHA

1144

35

30

32

36

37

30

46

30

53

38

367

37

CHANDRAPUR

1980

47

47

46

62

45

45

69

48

45

44

498

50

GADCHIROLI

874

24

27

17

23

22

41

45

33

12

18

262

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ALL MAHA

92727

869

898

988

1137

1297

1355

1434

1237

1149

1311

11675

1168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  chart 2

 

 

Chart 3 below is a graphical depiction of the rate of rapes committed in 1996, the 10-year average and the rate of rapes committed in 1999.

 

chart 3

 

The above analysis speaks of rape cases in terms of absolute numbers. It can facilitate the government to decide upon the quantum of deployment of suitable investigative machinery, police personnel, computerization, better forensic facility, higher budget, closer monitoring, etc. in problem districts. A sociologist, however, is concerned more with the rate of crimes. Different districts have smaller or bigger geographical area and higher or lower population. Hence for a comparison, rate of crime provides a different variety of indicators. A district having lower population but higher number of rapes, is definitely a bigger problem to the sociologists and they need to investigate the reasons for higher criminal mentality.

3. Crime rate

Chart 4 here shows the rate of rapes per crore population during the 1995 to 1999.

Chart 4

district

95%

96%

97%

98%

99%

av rate 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MUMBAI

156

114

100

91

108

98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SINDHUDURG

105

140

105

81

105

93

RATNAGIRI

86

67

80

110

159

92

RAIGAD

69

74

74

79

99

69

THANE

145

153

150

139

146

132

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KOLHAPUR

73

49

67

97

103

73

SANGLI

103

74

95

95

91

99

SOLAPUR

95

120

83

114

100

89

SATARA

82

101

86

86

101

89

PUNE

144

135

113

142

161

127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NASHIK

100

119

80

91

73

80

DHULE

89

103

146

64

106

96

JALGAON

77

114

125

63

108

83

AHMEDNAGAR

83

117

88

83

64

85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AURANGABAD

130

194

120

116

130

120

JALNA

38

134

140

140

89

70

PARBHANI

121

100

113

92

125

83

NANDED

101

71

115

45

112

78

BEED

63

111

131

73

145

92

LATUR

52

115

94

79

31

63

OSMANABAD

113

70

85

85

162

99

 

 

 

 

 

 

BULDHANA

 

 

-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black'>109

 

176

133

95

128

123

AKOLA

127

177

99

119

123

119

AMRAVATI tot

456

418

364

305

444

343

YAVATMAL

238

304

198

251

308

233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BHANDARA

279

359

319

222

279

270

NAGPUR

360

301

247

247

239

266

WARDHA

262

402

262

463

332

323

CHANDRAPUR

227

349

242

227

222

253

GADCHIROLI

469

515

378

137

206

297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

all maha

146

155

133

124

141

126

 

From these it is seen,

More rapes than their population share? 

Chart 5 below shows the ranking of all districts in order of the rate of rapes per crore, in 1996. It also gives the share of the district in the total number of rapes in last 10 years as well as share in population. The share in rapes rates over 10 years has been graphically represented in Chart 6, whereas share in rape rates is at the end of the article.

 

Chart 5

<district sort

popu

% Rp 96

10 yr av

Rp share

pop share

diff.

GADCHIROLI

874

515

26

2.2

0.9

1.3

AMRAVATI

2390

418

82

7.0

2.6

4.4

WARDHA

1144

402

37

3.2

1.2

1.9

BHANDARA

2256

359

61

5.2

2.4

2.8

CHANDRAPUR

1980

349

50

4.3

2.1

2.1

YAVATMAL

2270

304

53

4.5

2.4

2.1

NAGPUR.

3718

301

99

8.5

4.0

4.5

AURANGABAD

2161

194

26

2.2

2.3

-0.1

AKOLA

2435

177

29

2.5

2.6

-0.1

BULDHANA

2106

176

26

2.2

2.3

0.0

THANE

6979

153

92

7.9

7.5

0.4

SINDHUDURG

859

140

8

0.7

0.9

-0.2

PUNE

6389

135

81

6.9

6.9

0.0

JALNA

1567

134

11

0.9

1.7

-0.7

SOLAPUR

3595

120

32

2.7

3.9

-1.1

NASIK

4384

119

35

3.0

4.7

-1.7

AHMEDNAGAR

3757

117

32

2.7

4.1

-1.3

LATUR

1907

115

12

1.0

2.1

-1.0

JALGAON

3515

114

29

2.5

3.8

-1.3

BEED

2065

111

19

1.6

2.2

-0.6

DHULE

2818

103

27

2.3

3.0

-0.7

MUMBAI

15000

102

147

12.6

16.2

-3.6

SATARA

2685

101

24

2.1

2.9

-0.8

PARBHANI

2400

100

20

1.7

2.6

-0.9

SANGLI

2422

74

24

2.1

2.6

-0.6

RAIGAD

2020

74

14

1.2

2.2

-1.0

NANDED

2684

71

21

1.8

2.9

-1.1

OSMANABAD

1419

70

14

1.2

1.5

-0.3

RATNAGIRI

1633

67

15

1.3

1.8

-0.5

KOLHAPUR

3295

49

24

2.1

3.6

-1.5

all maha

92727

154.6

1168

100.0

100.0

0.0

 

chart 6

 

 

 

 

 

4. Urban Scenario

 

·         A comparison is also made between the rapes committed in rural and urban areas. Chart 7 give a comparison of rapes committed in major cities of Maharashtra, namely, Mumbai, Thane, Pune, Solapur, Nasik, Aurangabad and Amravati.

chart 7

 

DTNAME

POPULN 91

Un M Lit%

U F Lit%>

R M Lit%

R F Lit%

urb

rur

total

% of u/t Rp

% of u/t pop

MUMBAI

9925891

77

65

 

 

147

 

147

 

 

THANE

5249126

72

61

51

31

45

47

92

49

65

RAIGARH

1824816

74

60

60

40

 

 

 

 

 

RATNAGIRI

1544057

78

67

62

42

 

 

 

 

 

SINDHUDURG

832152

82

73

73

58

 

 

 

 

 

NASHIK

3851352

71

57

54

31

9

26

35

26

36

DHULE

2535715

71

55

47

26

 

 

 

 

 

JALGAON

3187634

72

55

61

37

 

 

 

 

 

A'NAGAR

3372935

73

56

59

34

 

 

 

 

 

PUNE

5532532

75

62

62

38

48

32

80

60

51

SATARA

2451372

76

62

65

43

 

 

 

 

 

SANGLI

2209488

70

55

61

39

 

 

 

 

 

SOLAPUR

3231057

68

47

53

29

13

19

32

41

29

KOLHAPUR

2989507

75

60

65

40

 

 

 

 

 

AURANGABAD

2213779

70

51

52

22

12

14

26

46

33

JALNA

1364425

63

43

48

17

 

 

 

 

 

PARBHANI

2117035

63

42

48

18

 

 

 

 

 

BID

1822072

67

46

49

21

 

 

 

 

 

NANDED

2330374

65

44

47

19

 

 

 

 

 

OSMANABAD

1276327

68

47

53

29

 

 

 

 

 

LATUR

1676641

67

46

54

28

 

 

 

 

 

BULDANA

1886299

70

53

60

33

 

 

 

 

 

AKOLA

2214271

70

57

61

38

 

 

 

 

 

AMRAVATI

2200057

73

62

62

46

13

59

72

18

33

YAVATMAL

2077144

73

58

55

33

 

 

 

 

 

WARDHA

1067357

76

65

63

47

 

 

 

 

 

NAGPUR

3287139

74

62

60

42

48

51

99

48

62

BHANDARA

2107629

78

61

64

40

 

 

 

 

 

CHANDRAPUR

1771994

71

55

55

33

 

 

 

 

 

GADCHIROLI

787010

69

49

44

21

 

 

 

 

 

ALL MAHA

78937187

73

60

57

34

335

 

 

 

 

 

The total rapes committed in these cities during the last 10 years are 29% of total rapes in Maharashtra while the total population of these cities was 32% of the total population of Maharashtra in 1996.

A comparison between the crimes committed in the whole of the district and those committed in the city alone show that Pune city contributed for 60% of the total crimes in Pune district, while Nagpur city contributed 48% of rapes in Nagpur district. This proportion was 49% in Thane city (vis-a-vis Thane district), 46% in Aurangabad city, 41% in Solapur city, 26% in Nasik and 18% in Amravati city. A comparison of these figures with the female literacy rate shows that all the cities have a fairly high female liveracy rate. Surely, therefore, the reasons for high rate of rapes cannot be attributed to lack of education.

The reason is perhaps to be searched in terms of industrialization, agro based economy, tribal population, low economic growth, a larger divide between high and low income groups and so on.

·         Another important feature is a comparison of per centages of urban to total rapes Vs urban to total population of these districts. Pune, Solapur, and Aurangabad have more rapes in urban areas than the population there whereas Thane, Nagpur, Nashik and Amravati have more rapes in rural areas. The rural parts of all these 4 districts have a larger tribal population. This is also a pointer. Once again, more detailed studies as to who were victims and who were accused is needed.

·         Which districts have lowest rural female literacy rates? They are the districts of Marathwada Division, namely Aurangabad, Jalna, Parbhani, Nanded, Beed, Latur and Osmanabad; all having less than 30% rural female literacy. Except Gadchiroli, no other district has such low rates of rural female literacy and yet, by and large these are districts of low rape rate except the highly industrial city of Aurangabad.

 

5. See chart 5 (colunms to be inserted): On comparing the incidence of rapes with the incidence of total crimes in a district, it is seen that -

 

chart 8

Chart 8 above shows the difference in rates of rape and total crime. Districts of high crime- high rapes and those of low crime- low rapes will both fall near the zero line. Yet another insight can be had from Chart 9 and Chart 10 which give graded maps of Maharashtra showing the rate of rapes vis-a-vis rate of total crimes committed in 1996 in all districts.

6. So we can see what kind of analysis and implementation strategy is possible. The existing crime records give us some district specific clues and recommendations. For example, it suggests that -  

(i) The Home Deptt. of Maharashtra may immediately take a review of their police strength and efficiency of investigation including preventing measures in the Nagpur and Amravati divisions so as to control the higher rate of rapes in these Divisions. 

(ii) Ratnagiri has shown a sharp increase in 1998. The reasons for such increase in an otherwise peace-loving and women- respecting district like Ratnagiri need to be searched. This can be taken up by the Supdt. of Police of Ratnagiri. 

(iii) Special efforts are needed to reduce the higher rate of crime in Amravati (Rural) and Nagpur (both urban and rural). 

(iv) Special study sould be undertaken to find out the socio-economic profile of the victims and the accused in the tribal blocks of Amravati and Nagpur divisions, as well as in tribal blocks of Nashik and Thane districts.

  It will be worthwhile to compare this data with the situation in Dhule which is also predominantly tribal district but with low rate of rapes. It is pertinent to note that the tribals of Dhule district have slightly better land-holdings than the tribals of other districts of Maharashtra.

 

7. In all the above analysis two factors are not being considered. In many cases of rapes the societical conditions and the fear of stigma on the victim girl prevent her and her family from making a complaint to the police. In many cases they are also afraid of the humiliating manner and questions that are asked by police and therefore refrain from making a complaint. In many more cases the police closes the complaint without registering FIR and without making further investigation butby stating that there was not enough evidence to proceed with the cases. More cases of first two types will come to light by a better awareness and sensitization programmes and support systems which can be provided by the NGOs. For taking case of the third type of cases, which are commonly called “NC” cases, it should be made compulsory for the police to register FIR for each and every case of complaint of rape made to them and bring up it before the court whatever be the preliminary findings. It should also be compulsory to report of this data on a monthly basis to NCRB who should then publish the same in their annual reports. A comparison of the number of crimes recorded and the number of “cases closed without investigation” can be a key indicator about the working of the police in the district.

 

8. Surprisingly the district of Ahmadnagar as compared to other districts was comparatively a low crime district (as far as rape was concerned) except during 1996. This image of Ahmadnagar will now remain shattered forever in the wake of recent incidence of collective and multiple rapes committed by young dacoits on the women of village Kothewadi. This was a case of a gang rape as well as mass rape which was so far unheard of in Maharashtra and can be considered as the most obnoxious crime. It has so far, also eluded all explanations of traditional types. The gory details of the incidence are indicative of the new methods and psyche being brought into crime scenario by the media depictions of women.

 

9. Some new aspects and some theoretical questions go beyond the analysis of the data -

 

(I) There is a sharp increase in organized rape and sexual exploitation of women. The incidence like mass rapes in Kothewadi is likely to repeat. It will require a very different and concerted approach to prevent any such incidence in future. It is quite obvious that such thinking and efforts have not yet started. 

(II) In recent past, we have also faced the sex scandals in Jalgaon (in 1994) and Satara (2001) in which women were given temptation of jobs, were lured into sexual act and their photographs were taken in compromising situations and they were subjected to further repeated blackmails, rape and other forms of sexual exploitation. Such a criminal activity went on for a long period of one to two years involving several girls who were victimized and several males who had organized such victimization. These cases came to light only after long periods had elapsed and therefore became difficult to prove even though their gravity was much higher. 

(III) Perhaps the worst was not over. In Parbhani district, we heard the case of one girl student being called by her several teachers to give her the “most expected questions” for the next day’s. She was gangraped by her own teachers. This incidence strikes at the very root of Indian culture where it is believed that true knowledge comes only through a very pure relationship and understanding between the teacher and the student.

 

10. Although the cases of gang rapes, mass rapes and scandals like the above have started occuring with alarming frequency, the police has not yet started maintaining separate or specialised investigations. This must be started immediately so that the problem is monitored properly and its solution is tried early.

 

11. It must be mentioned that this article is meant to analyse only the profile of crimes against women which are brought up to the police. It does not discuss the questions of -  

(i) Poor rate of conviction.

(ii) Enormous delay in justice delivery.

(iii) Attitude and ethical/legal responsibility of the defence lawyers.

(iv) Efficiency or otherwise of the prosecution machinery.

(v) Inadequate monitoring by the apex courts.

(vi) Inadequate and at times faulty examination by the forensic agencies.

(vii) Faulty investigation and improper handling or mishandling of the evidence material by the police. 

Each of these aspects are important in reducing the rate of crime and ensuring proper justice. Each, therefore, merits a separate detailed study and analysis.

 

[The author is Joint Secretary to Govt. of India in National Commission for Women. This is part of her study of Maharashtra Profiles of Crimes Against Women. ]